SPARK-1307 [DOCS] Don't use term 'standalone' to refer to a Spark Application #2787
SPARK-1307 [DOCS] Don't use term 'standalone' to refer to a Spark Application #2787srowen wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
…usion with standalone deployment mode. And fix placement of reference to this in MLlib docs.
|
Test FAILed. |
|
I think this is a good idea. I'll leave this here so others can comment, but this LGTM as it is. |
|
test this please |
|
LGTM too. Waiting for Jenkins. |
|
Test FAILed. |
|
We probably don't need to run tests on this one since it modifies only docs. |
|
I tested locally but It is still safer to see Jenkins happy. |
|
test this please |
|
QA tests have started for PR 2787 at commit
|
|
QA tests have finished for PR 2787 at commit
|
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Merged into master. Thanks! |
5 participants
HT to Diana, just proposing an implementation of her suggestion, which I rather agreed with. Is there a second/third for the motion?
Refer to "self-contained" rather than "standalone" apps to avoid confusion with standalone deployment mode. And fix placement of reference to this in MLlib docs.